Home   |   Companies   |   Browse Archives   |   HR Awards   |   Subscribe   |   Advertising     
Search Site


HR directory
Career development
Consultants
Employment law / OHS
HR management & strategy
International HR
Leadership development
Learning & development
Organisational change & Development
Psychological services
Recruitment
Recruitment by sector
Remuneration & benefits
Technology
 
 
 

  News September 3, 2010
NZ firms concerned over people risk
By Stuart Fagg
 
New Zealand companies see human capital as their biggest risk, according to research.

A study by Senate Communications Counsel and TNS Global found that NZ executives believe human capital risks are the most serious facing their organizations, above reputation risks, IT networking risks and regulation. Conversely, terrorism was seen as a major threat by just 2 per cent of respondents.

The NZ findings back a number of Australian and global studies suggesting people risk is seen as a serious threat. Insurance broker Aon’s annual study of risk management trends found that human capital risk is now the third largest risk concern, its highest rating since the study began. Fellow broker Marsh, meanwhile, reported recently that loss of key staff is among the top three risks facing its clients. Only competitive pressure was seen as bigger risk.

The Senate research also found that NZ executives see human capital issues as making up a minor part of organisational reputation. Just 9 per cent of those polled believed that general public perception of how employees are treated by their organisations influences the quality of reputation. That’s despite the experience of NZ firm Progressive Enterprises, which was the subject of intense media vilification over its handling of employee wage bargaining.

The company – a subsidiary of Woolworths – became locked in an industrial spat with two unions over increased pay demands. After distribution centre workers went on strike over the dispute, the company locked them out indefinitely, blaming the union’s demands. Soon, TV coverage began running stories about empty shelves in the firm’s supermarkets and reports also circulated that the company was paying more than three times the normal amount for distribution during the lockout.

Corporate and workplace culture is increasingly being linked to reputation. For example, the 2004 rogue trading incident at National Australia Bank – in which the firm lost $360 million – was exacerbated by the culture in the bank’s trading operations, according to investigations that followed.

10 July 2007

Send this article to colleague/friend

More news for News
Australian managers lack self-awareness
Regional employees more engaged than metro cousins
The myths of workplace bullying revealed
HR must step up gender pay equity efforts
Extended deadline: Last chance to enter HR Compass Awards!


Home |  Archived Articles |  Advertising |  About Us |  Contact Us |  Privacy Policy

Copyright © Reed Business Information. All material on this site is subject to copyright. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be reproduced, translated, transmitted, framed or stored in a retrieval system for public or private use without the written permission of the publisher.

eNewsletter
 
enter email to register/unregister
Resources
Book Reviews
Web Reviews
Professional Links
Conferences
Breakfast Briefings
LexisNexis
Lawyers Weekly
Risk Management